|
http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~corn/ |
![]() |
May 13 - 20, 2002
C.O.R.N. 2002-13
In This Issue:
A) Management Considerations For Late Planted Corn
B) Nitrogen Loss In Ohio In 2002
C) Late Planted Corn & Seeding Rates
D) Considering A Change From Corn To Soybeans - Remember To
Scn Fields In A Rotation
E) Wet Soils Favor Soil-Borne Pathogens
Persistent wet weather across Ohio has kept farmers out of fields for most of April and probably for the first three weeks of May. According to the Ohio Agricultural Statistics Service, only 17% of the state's corn crop and 6 % of the soybean crop was planted as of May 12 (compared with past five year averages of 70% and 44%, respectively, for corn and soybeans). Planting delays may require some adjustments in hybrid selection and other management practices.Most of the hybrid maturities commonly grown in Ohio will mature safely when planted as late as the end of May. However, growers in the northern third of Ohio should consider switching from adapted full season hybrids to adapted early and mid season hybrids by the last week of May. Growers in central Ohio should consider switching to earlier adapted hybrids during the first week of June, and in southern Ohio, where the growing season is longer, growers can probably wait until June 1015 before switching hybrid maturities. Corn planted for silage may be planted until June 1015 if not later and still produce yields of high quality feed. When selecting hybrids for delayed planting (through early June), DON'T switch to early maturity (90-95 day or earlier) hybrids which are not adapted to Ohio. In some areas of southern Ohio, switching to unadapted earlier hybrids may limit disease control. In fields where virus and foliar diseases like Maize Dwarf Mosaic and gray leaf spot are a problem, early season hybrids generally do not have the same level of resistance found in late maturity hybrids. Similarly, the grain quality and stress tolerance of these early hybrids are often inferior to adapted hybrids. Therefore, producers should not switch to earlier maturing hybrids any sooner than necessary. Contact your seed company representative for specifics on GDD requirements of late planted hybrids and the availability of earlier maturing adapted hybrids. When corn planting (for grain) production is delayed beyond mid-June growers should consider switching to crops other than corn except in far southern counties.
Corn seeding rates should not be changed much as planting is delayed. Since soils should be warmer in late May and early June, we can generally reduce seeding rates slightly in anticipation of a higher percentage of emergence and faster growth. See the article "Late-Planted Corn & Seeding Rates" in this issue of C.O.R.N. (5-13-02) for more information on this topic.
If soil test P and K levels are relatively high, eliminate starter fertilizer application. This will help save time and money with little risk of yield loss.
Reduced tillage and no-tillage are recommended to reduce compaction and speed the planting operation. No-till planter speed should not exceed 4 mph for best stands. Nitrogen applications should be delayed until after corn planting to allow planting to progress as rapidly as possible. The rate of nitrogen application should be reduced in accordance with the corn yield potential in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Expected Corn and Soybean Grain Yields for Various Planting Dates. _________________________________________________________________
Planting Date ------Percent Yield------
Corn Soybeans
(drilled)
------
May 17 100 100
May 814 93 100
May 2128 86 95
May 29June 4 79 88
June 510 70 80
--------------------------------------------------------
A recent OSU study indicated that when planted on or about May 1 a corn crop
generally required 100 to 150 lb N/acre to achieve optimum yield for the individual
growing season. There was no significant effect of application method; split
applications of N produced yields comparable to those produced by at planting
applications. Corn planted on or about June 1, however, showed different responses
with little or no benefit accrued
from applying more than 100 lb N/acre. At the 100 lb N/acre rate, yield was
optimized to the point where costs of further fertilizer addition would not
be recovered in additional yield except at very low fertilizer prices.
Depending on current corn and soybean costs of production, yield response to
date of planting (Table 1), and expected fall prices, soybeans may be more profitable
than corn after June 1. The decision to plant soybeans in the place of corn
will be determined by the need for corn as feed, government program restrictions,
crop rotation benefits, and whether either nitrogen or herbicides have been
applied to unplanted fields. Corn planting
delays may result in higher grain drying costs if the crop dries slower than
normal in late September and October.
The warmer-than-normal winter, coupled with a wet spring, has many wondering
whether nitrogen loss is or will be greater than normal for the 2002 crop year.
Fortunately, research conducted at the University of Illinois over a number
of years has provided a data base on which to make an informed decision about
the amount of N loss that has occurred or that might occur in the next few weeks.
Nitrogen loss associated with excessively wet soils will occur only from that
portion of the fertilizer that is in the nitrate form when soils become saturated.
Because most fertilizers are applied as ammonium or a form that quickly converts
to ammonium, you must first determine how much of the applied nitrogen has been
converted to nitrate. This rate of conversion of ammonium to nitrate--a process
called nitrification--is primarily dependent on soil temperature. Nitrification
does not occur when soils are frozen, but it does occur at temperatures above
freezing and is faster the warmer soils are. Equations that define the relationship
between soil temperature and nitrification have been developed for two Illinois
soils, a Drummer silty clay loam and a Cisne silt loam. These equations, using
daily soil temperature data provided by the Illinois State Water Survey for
the Drummer at DeKalb and Bondville and the Cisne at Brownstown were used to
estimate the amount of fall-applied nitrogen that had been converted to nitrate
during the winter and spring of 2001-2002. As expected, there were significant
differences in the rate of nitrification, dependent on location, with higher
values the farther south in the state. Addition of a nitrification inhibitor,
N-Serve, substantially reduced the rate of conversion of ammonium to nitrate.
The conversion of ammonium to nitrate does not mean that it has been lost from
the soil system but rather that it is susceptible to loss in fields that have
been or may become saturated with water for several days. When soils are excessively
wet, nitrogen will
be lost through the process of denitrification or leaching. As of April 1, the
amount of nitrate-nitrogen lost from tile lines was less than 6% of the equivalent
of the total fertilizer nitrogen applied without a nitrification inhibitor in
a central Illinois experiment. Denitrification is the major nitrogen loss mechanism
in most Illinois soils, particularly in medium to heavy textured soils. Illinois
research has shown that 4 to 5% of the amount of nitrate-nitrogen present (note
that this is not 4 to 5% of the total nitrogen applied) will be lost via denitrification
for each day that soils are saturated when soil temperature is above 65 to 70
deg F. At temperatures less than 55 deg F, it is estimated that denitrification
will be closer to 1 to 2% of the nitrogen that is in the nitrate form. Prior
to April 25, soil temperatures were less than 55 deg F all but 8 days in central
and northern Illinois and 15 days in southern Illinois. Assuming 7 days of saturated
soils in late April and 160 pounds of nitrogen applied without a nitrification
inhibitor on November 1, 2001, the loss potential would be 160 lb N/acre x 59%
[.59] (nitrification rate) x 19% [.19] (7 days saturated at 2% denitrification
per day + 5% leaching) = 18 lb N/acre loss for a central Illinois location.
If a nitrification inhibitor had been used, the loss potential would be reduced
to 160 x .23 x .19 = 7 lb N/acre. For a southern Illinois location, the comparable
situation would be 160 x 100% x .19 = 30 lb N/acre without an inhibitor, or
20 lb N/acre with an inhibitor. The bottom line of this analysis is that most
producers need not worry about N loss up to this time. They can save that worry
for later in the season if soils become saturated. This information will be
updated as the season progresses. Additional nitrogen is not being recommended
at this time to compensate for loss. Producers should wait until late May when
additional information will be available to better predict the need for additional
nitrogen.
Among the many questions raised by Indiana & Ohio
corn growers as the rain-delayed planting season continues is whether delayed
planting should influence their seeding rate decisions for corn. As might be
expected, several factors need to be considered.
First of all, what defines 'optimum' final population for corn in our two states?
For most of our production areas, the answer is a range of final stands from
28-32,000 plants per acre. Some exceptions exist for that rule of thumb. Marginally
yielding soils (consistently less than about 120 bu/ac) probably respond best
to final populations nearer to 24,000 plants per acre, while exceptionally high
yielding environments (greater than 180 bu/ac) probably respond better at final
stands approaching 34-36,000 plants per acre. So, the first step for Indiana
& Ohio corn growers when considering late planting consequences for seeding
rates is to determine whether they are normally seeding at rates that will achieve
the optimum final stands for the productivity level of each field in their operation.
Typically, seeding rates are calculated based on an assumed 90 percent success
of germination, emergence, and seedling survival. For example, to achieve a
targeted final stand of 30,000 plants per acre at harvest, one would seed at
a rate equal to about 33,300 seeds per acre (30,000 divided by 0.90). If you
are already following these seeding rate guidelines, then delayed planting should
not alter those seeding rates because the range of optimum final plant populations
is similar for early and late planted corn. Table 1 illustrates the similarity
of yield responses to population for corn planted at varying planting dates
in research conducted by the Univ. of Illinois. Regardless of planting date,
optimum grain yield occurs for most situations within a similar range of final
populations.
Caveats: Choose What Fits Your Situation.
That said, it is important to recognize that no two farming situations are the
same. Caveats and exceptions abound and should be considered when making a decision
about seeding rates for late plantings.
* R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Agronomy Dept., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN P.R. Thomison, Hort. & Crop Sci. Dept, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH
Soybean cyst nematode has been found in close to 30 to 40% of the production fields in Ohio. SCN is best managed through crop rotation. SCN can increase 8 to 10 fold in population when a susceptible soybean variety is planted and can decrease by 50% in years when a non-host such as corn is planted. For those fields in which SCN has been identified, be sure to keep them in the rotation. Once SCN is identified in a field, it becomes a "life-long" commitment to manage those SCN populations and keep them at levels well below where economic damage can occur.
Let me describe the scenario that we use in the laboratory to favor isolation and baiting of Phytophthora and Pythium out of soils. We dry the soil in the greenhouse, place it in pots, saturate it for 24 hours, drain slightly and incubate it wet for 2 weeks. Seeds are planted in the soil and allowed to germinate. We then flood the soil again for 24 hours and begin to count the number of seedlings that die over the next 5 to 7 days. Sound familiar? Fields have been saturated for the past month - allowing for incubation and priming of oospores of both Pythium and Phytophthora. It will be critical this year to apply seed treatments. Pythium spp. are excellent seed rotters and typically effects soybeans in the early part of the year. Phytophthora sojae can cause seed rot, root rot and stem rot thus can attack plant season long. The challenge we now face is that the Phytophthora sojae has changed or adapted and can now cause disease on many varieties which carry the resistance genes (Rps1a, Rps1c, Rps1k). Partial resistance (also called field resistance or general resistance) is not effective or able to limit infections to an economic level until that plant is up and photosynthesizing. Seed treatments can potentially provide protection to soybeans against Phytophthora until that plant is up and out of the ground. Seed treatment products with metalaxyl or mefenoxam sold as Allegiance or Apron XL are the only products that can provide protection against these two pathogens. For hytophthora only the high rates are effective. If you have had stand problems in 1997, 2000 or 2001, if your fields are poorly drained, if you have seen an increase in the amount of late season Phytophthora - these are the fields to shoot for the 1.5 fl oz rate of Allegiance or 0.64 fl oz of Apron XL.
Readers can subscribe electronically to this newsletter by sending an e-mail message to: corn-out-on@postoffice.ag.ohio-state.edu. A successful subscription message will receive by an automatic reply from the listserv. Contact your local Ohio State University Extension Office or e-mail labarge.1@osu.edu if you have problems subscribing.
Past versions of C.O.R.N. can be found on the World Wide Web at: http:/www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~corn/archive/
C.O.R.N. is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio Crop Producers and Industry. C.O.R.N. is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, State Specialists at The Ohio State University and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. C.O.R.N. Questions are directed to State Specialists, Extension Associates, and Agents associated with Ohio State University Extension and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center at The Ohio State University.
Ohio State University Specialists and Associates: Pat Lipps , Anne Dorrance , (Plant Pathology), , Mark Loux & Jeff Stachler (Weed Science), RonEditor: Steve Prochaska Web Editor: Tom Rosati
Information presented above and where trade names are used, they are supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.
All educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Keith L. Smith, Director, Ohio State University Extension.
TDD # 1 (800) 589-8292 (Ohio only) or (614) 292-1868
| C.O.R.N. | Newsletter | Archive | Search | Questions? | Ohioline | Publications |